about something? (1-12-2010)
Read[*] and Wrong?
Not that I am reviewing but, sometimes we can learn from mistakes. While others just run. There is a vast difference between the Reid and Lott phraMING, not to mention accountabilities. Well, actually read Mention, not to mention Read(later). [Steven Seagal anyone? Ouch**, just "noting".]
[Not to mention...Ouch! I quip, youReid!]
[*] 1-13-10: (1st 3 of 5 bolds added)
My original nuance(intuition) was that Game Change(the book) might be worth reading. While there are alternative opinions on that, I was also suggesting that Fire Dog Lake may have made tenuous leaps. My tenous links are(often) acknowledged leaps that might later be confirmed. My tweak of "framing" was a prophetic hint at the effect on history and The Republic, which sometimes(more so lately) even I have had to work at retrieving.
[**]To which rather than ribble, I will just add Newt Gingrich. My original Read was actually Wright in light of conspiracies and abilities.
[Even a stopped clock is right twice a day: the comment (24AheadDotCom)hits two valid points on logic and getting things done over some very questionable charges, not to question the article which I did read(no pun) but the Game Change has been long in coming.]
No comments:
Post a Comment